A comment to my entry "It's not going to stop ..." asked if I assumed that the absence of war is peace. I had meant to reply at length, but my intention got lost in the shuffle of too many projects happening at once.
My short answer to the question is, quite simply, no. The long answer will take more time to formulate.
In the meantime, consider this excerpt from Desmond Tutu an introduction to my extended thoughts on the matter:
Stability and peace in our land will not come from the barrel of a gun, because peace without justice is an impossibility.
Many are beginning to think the only way forward is the way of armed struggle. But I am certain that if we were to say today the government is serious about dismantling apartheid most people would be glad. None of our people is really bloodthirsty. They just want their place under the sun, a place where they are acknowledged for what they are--human beings made in the image of God.
I am opposed to both the violence of those who maintain an unjust system and the violence of those who seek to overthrow it. The important point to make is that many people think violence is something that is going to be introduced from the outside by the so-called terrorists, the people of the liberation movements. The situation in South Africa is already a violent one. It is the institutional violence, the structural violence of apartheid, that has caused the answering violence of the liberation movements.
I am a lover of peace and I try to work for justice because only thus do I believe we can ever hope to establish durable peace. It is self-defeating to justify a truce based on unstable foundations of oppression. Such a truce can only be inherently unstable, requiring that it be maintained by institutional violence.
Desmond Tutu
retired Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, South Africa
from The Words of Desmond Tutu
More to come, I'm sure ...
