on Monday night, we held the first meeting of the "Cultivate Three Rivers Initiative," as we've come to tentatively call it. honestly, a lot of people left angry. I think there was some misunderstanding about the purpose of the meeting, in part due to a letter by JoAnn Roberts that appeared in Saturday?s Commercial News. We did shape the agenda of the meeting somewhat in response to the letter, because we knew at that point that many people would attend the meeting who passionately support Wal-Mart and we wanted to avoid an unproductive shouting match. I did a brief introduction, emphasizing that no matter what personal opinion people held, we hoped to involve all those who wanted to seriously analyze the issue from every angle and discover what would be best for the Three Rivers area as a whole.
I did take a couple of factual questions, although I was reluctant for the afore-mentioned reason. In response to one of those questions, Becky Shank summarized the current actions of Fabius Township, which was very helpful. Most of what she said can be found in her Guest Viewpoint piece from Tuesday?s paper.
though I regrettably had to close the meeting to avoid an unplanned public debate, I feel like we did manage to network with some new people, spark much-needed discussion, and get some good responses on our posters (?I love Three Rivers because?? and ?My future vision for Three Rivers includes??). themes of the responses include a sense of home, love of a small community, a desire for wise growth, and encouragement for downtown development.
I?m realizing more and more how the problem of Wal-Mart goes so much deeper than just free market competition and municipal decisions--who can win at the powerplay game. Wal-Mart?s overwhelming success speaks to our society?s values. we generally value the low price over the high price, convenience over forethought, the ?immediate? over the ?long-term.? so it?s questionable whether the effort to cultivate values of local economy, long-term vision, and principled purchasing can take place on a community-wide scale instead of just among a small group of people (a family, a church, etc.)
perhaps *cino is exactly the response that's needed, encouraging Christians to act out shared values in constant critique of the dominant culture. but even then, we can agree on the generalities, but still have opposite views on the particulars.
and so we press on...
